Skip to main content

FILGOTINIB DEMONSTRATES DURABLE EFFICACY AND CONSISTENT SAFETY PROFILE AT 52 WEEKS IN FINCH 1 AND 3 STUDIES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

  Integrated Safety Analysis from the Phase 3 FINCH and Phase 2 DARWIN Programs Informs Long-Term Safety Profile of Filgotinib in RA Data Presented at The European League Against Rheumatism, EULAR, European E-Congress of Rheumatology 2020Foster City, Calif., & Mechelen, Belgium, 4 June, 2020, 07.00 CET – Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) and Galapagos NV (Euronext & Nasdaq: GLPG) today announced Week 52 results from the Phase 3 FINCH 1 and FINCH 3 studies of filgotinib, an investigational, oral, selective JAK1 inhibitor, in adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The data demonstrate sustained efficacy and a consistent safety profile with up to 52 weeks of filgotinib treatment across RA patient populations. The new data are among 15 abstracts on filgotinib in RA that will be presented at the European League Against Rheumatism, EULAR, European E-Congress of Rheumatology 2020.“Many people with RA struggle with uncontrolled symptoms that affect their daily lives. We are working to develop effective and well-tolerated treatment options that will make a difference in the lives of patients,” said Mark Genovese, MD, Senior Vice President, Inflammation, Gilead Sciences. “These data add to the body of evidence supporting filgotinib as a potential treatment option for a range of RA patients.”“After more than 4,544 patient years’ exposure thus far, the FINCH and DARWIN programs continue to show that filgotinib has a consistent efficacy and safety profile and has the potential to help more people living with RA achieve symptom control,” said Walid Abi-Saab, MD, Chief Medical Officer at Galapagos.FINCH 1 – 52-Week Data from Phase 3 Study in Patients with Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (Poster #0198)1
The FINCH 1 program evaluated filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab, on a stable background dose of methotrexate in patients with moderately to severely active RA who had prior inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR). Patients were randomized to receive filgotinib 200 mg once daily (n=475), filgotinib 100 mg once daily (n=480), adalimumab 40 mg bi-weekly (n=325) or matching placebo (n=475). As previously reported, the filgotinib 200 mg group met the primary study endpoint evaluating the proportion of patients who achieved American College of Rheumatology Criteria of at least a 20 percent improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints (ACR20) at Week 12 versus placebo. Filgotinib was superior to placebo in all secondary endpoints pertaining to signs and symptoms of RA, physical function and structural damage.
The majority of patients in FINCH 1 (80.7 percent, n=1,417/1755) completed 52 weeks of treatment with study drug. Both doses of filgotinib showed sustained efficacy in primary and secondary outcome measures at Week 52. In addition, a greater proportion of patients treated with filgotinib 200 mg achieved low disease activity (DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2) and clinical remission (DAS28(CRP) <2.6) compared with adalimumab-treated patients at Week 52 (nominal p<0.05). Rates of remission based on CDAI ≤2.8 and Boolean remission criteria were also nominally significantly higher in patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg versus adalimumab at Week 52 (nominal p<0.05). Reductions in Heath Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index from baseline to Week 52 were greater in patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg versus those receiving adalimumab (nominal p<0.05). Response rates were numerically similar between patients treated with filgotinib 100 mg versus adalimumab for these endpoints.Filgotinib 200 mg and 100 mg demonstrated a consistent safety profile in this study of MTX-IR patients, and no new safety signals were detected through Week 52. There were five deaths reported prior to Week 24; two patients were in the placebo group, two were in the filgotinib 200 mg group and one was in the filgotinib 100 mg group. Four deaths were reported between Weeks 24 and 52; two treated with filgotinib 200 mg, one in the adalimumab group, and one in the placebo group. Adverse events of interest including serious infections, herpes zoster, venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were infrequent and balanced across treatment groups. Herpes zoster was observed in all treatment groups, with a numeric increase in the filgotinib 200 mg group compared with the filgotinib 100 mg group.FINCH 3 – Week 52 Data from Phase 3 Study in Methotrexate-Naïve Patients (Poster #0158)2
The FINCH 3 program evaluated filgotinib in patients naïve to methotrexate. Patients were randomized to receive filgotinib 200 mg plus methotrexate (n=416), filgotinib 100 mg plus methotrexate (n=207), filgotinib 200 mg monotherapy (n=210) and methotrexate monotherapy (n=416). As previously reported, the filgotinib 200 mg plus methotrexate group met the primary study endpoint evaluating the proportion of patients who achieved ACR20 at Week 24 versus methotrexate monotherapy (p<0.001).
The majority of patients in FINCH 3 (78.1 percent, n=975/1,249) received study drug through Week 52. In this analysis, all treatment groups demonstrated sustained efficacy through Week 52 based on clinical response, physical function and radiographic progression. Higher proportions of patients in the filgotinib 200 mg plus methotrexate, 100 mg plus methotrexate and filgotinib 200 mg monotherapy achieved ACR20 (nominal p <0.001, p<0.01 and p<0.001), ACR50 (nominal p<0.001, p<0.01 and p<0.01), ACR70 response (nominal p<0.001, p<0.05, p<0.01) and disease remission (nominal p<0.001 for all three arms) compared with patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy at Week 52. Patients treated with filgotinib 200 mg plus methotrexate (nominal p<0.001) or filgotinib monotherapy (nominal p<0.05) experienced a significantly greater reduction in physical function (measured by reductions in Heath Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index from baseline) compared with those receiving methotrexate alone at Week 52. Patients in the filgotinib treatment groups demonstrated less progression of structural damage at Week 52 with filgotinib 200 mg plus methotrexate (nominal p<0.001); filgotinib 100 mg plus methotrexate and filgotinib 200 mg monotherapy (nominal p<0.05) versus patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy.Treatment with filgotinib either in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy demonstrated a consistent safety profile in this study of methotrexate-naive patients, and no new safety signals were detected. Three deaths were reported in the filgotinib 200 mg plus methotrexate group and one death was reported in the filgotinib 100 mg plus methotrexate group. Adverse events of interest, including rates of infections, serious infections and herpes zoster occurred at similar rates with filgotinib as methotrexate monotherapy. There were no VTEs reported in the filgotinib treatment groups.In addition to the 52-week FINCH 1 and FINCH 3 study results, new analyses on the safety and efficacy of filgotinib for the treatment of RA will also be presented at the congress.FINCH 2 – Subgroup Analysis in Patients with Inadequate Response to Biologic DMARDs (Poster #0204)3
Despite currently available treatments, many people living with RA have inadequate responses to biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR). In this subgroup analysis of clinical response to filgotinib in bDMARD-IR patients at Week 24, filgotinib demonstrated consistently higher rates of low disease activity and remission versus placebo that were independent of the number of prior bDMARDs or prior exposure to IL-6 or TNF inhibition. The differences in rates of low disease activity were statistically significant overall for filgotinib 200 mg versus placebo (nominal p<0.001).
Adverse events across subgroups were consistent with the overall study population.Integrated Safety Analysis from Phase 3 FINCH and Phase 2 DARWIN Programs (Poster #0202)4
An integrated safety analysis of pooled data from seven clinical trials of filgotinib in the FINCH Phase 3 and DARWIN Phase 2 programs reinforced the consistent safety profile of filgotinib in the treatment of RA, with no new safety concerns identified. Across the trials, 3,827 patients with RA received more than one dose of treatment for a total of 4,544.5 total patient years of exposure.
Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of serious adverse events or treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death in patients who received filgotinib were comparable with EAIRs in patients treated with placebo, adalimumab or methotrexate; no dose-dependent effects were noted. With filgotinib, EAIR of serious infections and herpes zoster were generally similar to adalimumab and methotrexate. Most cases of herpes zoster were mild to moderate and not serious. The frequency of MACE and VTE were numerically lower for filgotinib relative to placebo. In this integrated analysis, filgotinib was well-tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified.Filgotinib is an investigational drug whose efficacy and safety have not been demonstrated. It is not approved for use by any regulatory authority.  About the Filgotinib Collaboration5
Gilead and Galapagos NV are collaborative partners in the global development and commercialization of filgotinib in RA, and other inflammatory indications.  The companies have multiple clinical study programs for filgotinib in inflammatory diseases, including the FINCH Phase 3 program in rheumatoid arthritis, the Phase 3 SELECTION trial in ulcerativ colitis, the DIVERSITY Phase 3 trial in Crohn’s disease, the Phase 3 PENGUIN trials in psoriatic arthritis, as well as Phase 2 studies in uveitis and in small bowel and fistulizing Crohn’s disease. More information about clinical trials with filgotinib can be accessed at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
About Gilead Sciences

Disclaimer & Cookie Notice

Welcome to GOLDEA services for Professionals

Before you continue, please confirm the following:

Professional advisers only

I am a professional adviser and would like to visit the GOLDEA CAPITAL for Professionals website.

Important Notice for Investors:

The services and products offered by Goldalea Capital Ltd. are intended exclusively for professional market participants as defined by applicable laws and regulations. This typically includes institutional investors, qualified investors, and high-net-worth individuals who have sufficient knowledge, experience, resources, and independence to assess the risks of trading on their own.

No Investment Advice:

The information, analyses, and market data provided are for general information purposes only and do not constitute individual investment advice. They should not be construed as a basis for investment decisions and do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or individual needs of any recipient.

High Risks:

Trading in financial instruments is associated with significant risks and may result in the complete loss of the invested capital. Goldalea Capital Ltd. accepts no liability for losses incurred as a result of the use of the information provided or the execution of transactions.

Sole Responsibility:

The decision to invest or not to invest is solely the responsibility of the investor. Investors should obtain comprehensive information about the risks involved before making any investment decision and, if necessary, seek independent advice.

No Guarantees:

Goldalea Capital Ltd. makes no warranties or representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information provided. Markets are subject to constant change, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Regional Restrictions:

The services offered by Goldalea Capital Ltd. may not be available to all persons or in all countries. It is the responsibility of the investor to ensure that they are authorized to use the services offered.

Please note: This disclaimer is for general information purposes only and does not replace individual legal or tax advice.